Blue Jays’ Roy Halladay, Jack Morris captured the Hall of Fame narrative Tommy John struggled with

Tommy John, whose name is synonymous with UCL reconstruction surgery, has passed away. He was 83-years-old when he died at his home in Bradenton, Florida on Saturday (Aug. 16). One of his former teams, the New York Yankees announced his passing after releasing a "goodbye letter" from John who was struggling with his health.

The news of his passing brings around another discussion surrounding his Hall of Fame case. It has always been one of baseball’s strangest debates because it asks voters to separate two things that probably should have strengthened each other.

There is Tommy John the pitcher, the durable left-hander who won 288 games, posted a 3.34 ERA across 26 major-league seasons and made 700 career starts. Then there is Tommy John the medical pioneer, the first pitcher to successfully return from the groundbreaking elbow procedure that now carries his name and has extended, saved or reshaped countless careers since.

Somehow, instead of making his case feel overwhelming, those two parts of his legacy have often worked against each other. The surgery became so famous that it overshadowed his accomplishments as a pitcher. It became easier to overlook his pitching accomplishments because he came up just short of some automatic milestones that voters have traditionally loved.

That is where two former Toronto Blue Jays' pitchers can be used as a useful comparison. Roy Halladay and Jack Morris reached Cooperstown with very different cases, but both benefited from something John never quite captured: a Hall of Fame narrative that voters could eventually get behind.

Halladay’s finished with 203 wins and 2,117 strikeouts over his 16-year MLB career, with 12 of those seasons spent in Toronto. In 416 games, Halladay pitched 2749.1 innings and accumulated a 65.4 bWAR, leading the league in wins twice, in bWAR four times, and complete games seven times.

Those are all impressive totals but they aren't the eye popping numbers that historically get pitchers into the hall. One of the biggest Hall of Fame arguments was built around his dominance an era known for slugging. At his peak, Halladay was one of the defining starters of his generation. Halladay got rewarded for that, as he won two Cy Young Awards, and his complete-game excellence stood out in an era that began moving away from pitchers going the distance when given the ball.

Morris had a very different path. His statistical case was more complicated. He won 254 games but finished with a 3.90 ERA, the highest of any pitcher in the Hall of Fame. He never won a Cy Young Award. Yet his case survived because he "was a winner, and a workhorse." He was also the author of one of the most famous pitching performances in baseball history, a 10-inning shutout in Game 7 of the 1991 World Series.

Eventually, that narrative carried him to the Hall. Morris wasn't enshrined because his statistic screamed Hall of Famer, he got in because enough people believed his career represented what a Hall of Famer looked like in his era.

He brought durability, intimidation, and October success, winning multiple World Series titles. He was with the Detroit Tigers (1984) Twins (1991) and Blue Jays (1992, and technically 1993, though he didn't factor into a playoff game) when they captured their World Series championships, ironically, none of these franchises have won a championship since Morris left.

If the Hall of Fame can make room for Halladay’s peak, reputation and generational respect, and if it can make room for Morris’ winner’s aura and defining October moment, it is hard to understand why John’s combination of career value and sport-altering legacy has never been enough.

Tommy John's numbers back up his Hall of Fame case compared to Roy Halladay and Jack Morris

John went 288-231 with a 3.34 ERA. He won more games than Halladay and Morris. He had a lower ERA than Morris. He spent more than a quarter-century taking the ball, and after undergoing a procedure that was anything but routine at the time, he returned to win 164 more games. He has a higher bWAR (61.6) than Morris (just below Halladay's 64.2).

He pitched more innings than either guy (4710.1) and that is significant considering both Morris and Halladay, as mentioned, were guys that took the ball and didn't like to let their bullpens finish the job. His ERA+ is 111, more than Morris' 105 and he had more strikeouts than Halladay (2245), and less walks than Morris (1259).

John also paved the way for the proof of concept of a surgery that has completely changed the game. When Dr. Frank Jobe performed the experimental elbow reconstruction in 1974, John was not taking part in something pitchers had already come to understand as a reliable route back. He was betting his career on a procedure that changed the future of the sport.

The irony is that John’s medical legacy is so massive that it may have made his playing career feel smaller. His name is said constantly in baseball, but usually as shorthand for the surgery, and not for the name of the pitcher who made the comeback possible.

The narrative is important here because it also played a big part in Halladay and Morris respectively getting into the hall. Halladay went in posthumously, while Morris went in thanks to earning votes on a Committee Era's ballot, after 15 years on the ballot, receiving 61.5% of the vote in 2014, his final year of eligibility.

The Hall of Fame is not a place that is just about showing the counting stats of players. It is about the people who made an impact on the game and those who affected the history of the sport. Halladay had that, Morris eventually had that and John has always had that, and that should be enough to get his plaque hanging in Cooperstown.

Add us as a preferred source on Google

Follow