Blue Jays Trade Options: Absorbing Money to Fill OF Needs

The Blue Jays’ offseason has many fans up in arms and frustrated with the lack of big name free agent signings, blockbuster trades, and noteworthy transactions thus far. Personally, I really liked the Steve Pearce and Lourdes Gurriel Jr. signings, and think they have a very realistic chance to bring excellent value at a low cost, and the Kendrys Morales signing also filled a need.

However, that hasn’t been enough for fans that have their patience wearing thin, but the reality is that it’s only December, leaving plenty of time for them to make moves, and squash the ridiculous “inevitable mid 2017 season rebuild” hot takes.

Admittedly, Dexter Fowler was a signing that I would have loved. He was a perfect fit for this team, and his skillset is one that this team desperately needs, but can’t acquire via trade without giving up talent from their major league roster.

It’s easy to move on from the inability to nab Fowler, especially considering the contract it took to acquire him, but the hole in the outfield has become a hard problem to fix. The likelihood of Jose Bautista and Michael Saunders returning at this point seems low, the current free agent crop of outfielders is full of fourth outfielders and spare parts, and the trade market isn’t playing into the Blue Jays hand.

The Adam Eaton trade provided evidence that the Jays simply do not have the minor league system and top prospects available in order to make such a trade; furthermore, the apparent asking price for the Rockies centre fielder, Charlie Blackmon, starts with Marcus Stroman. Yeah, no thanks. Blackmon is a great player, but unless the Rockies are willing to throw in Jeff Hoffman or another MLB caliber starting pitcher, it doesn’t make much sense for the Jays to create a hole in the rotation in order to fill a hole in the OF.

The trade market will force the Jays to either unload their system once again, something they can’t afford to do if they want to have sustainable success, or take away talent from their major league roster. They could also look to find one-year stop gaps, like Jay Bruce and Curtis Granderson, but their upside is obviously limited.

On the surface, it seems like the Jays are in a lose-lose situation, and their best realistic option is to bring back Bautista or Edwin Encarnacion on a short term deal, and roll with platoons consisting of Pearce, Melvin Upton Jr., Dalton Pompey and Ezequiel Carrera. You can definitely find some value in there if they stay healthy, and if they’re managed properly, but that is an awfully underwhelming outfield group.

As ugly as it may sound, they do have plenty of payroll left, and if the reported $160 million 2017 payroll is still a reality, then they can find creative ways to use in order to fill the OF vacancy by absorbing high, undesirable contracts in order to reduce the cost to acquire talent, or increase the amount of talent coming back in return at a reduced asset cost.

The Atkins and Shapiro leadership team have already shown a penchant for targeting players with inflated contracts on teams looking to shed payroll in order to maximize the return coming back. The Francisco Liriano trade was an example of this, as they took on Liriano’s entire payroll commitment in order to get prospects Reese McGuire and Harold Ramirez in the deal.

The Upton trade is also an example of them targeting a bad contract, but that was a different situation because the Padres ate most of the remaining money owed to Upton; nonetheless, it’s a noteworthy trade due to the contractual implications involved.

Why do I think this a good idea to pursue? I believe the the combination of the thin FA market, expensive trade landscape, amount of payroll remaining, and the Jays willingness to hold onto near MLB ready prospects makes this scenario one an inviting for the Jays brass. They have money, and don’t seem encouraged to spend it through free agency, but if they can get talent they need in a deal where they use that payroll space to absorb a contract, I’m all for it.

This would allow them to acquire talent without having to give up assets that are usually associated to acquire such players, meaning they can keep their prospect pool strong while filling major league needs.

These type of deals have a ton of moving parts and unpredictable conditions due to the financial aspect of such a trade; therefore, guessing on what the potential cost for these packages frivolous process. Instead, I’ll just go through situations where I think a deal has the potential to take place, not where these deals have been discussed or speculated upon so far this offseason.

There’s been a ton of talk about the Detroit Tigers this offseason, initially because of their willingness to trade off assets in order to both shed payroll and rebuild their weak farm system. Recently, there have been reports that they’re going to keep assets and adjust mid season if necessary, and that their high asking prices are high enough to push away potential buyers.

So, it’s tough to say at this point what they’re going to ultimately end up doing, as a trade for one or two players could send a domino effect through the organization at any moment. Despite the unpredictability of their offseason plan, I still believe that they’re a team that is open to this type of trade.

The player I’d target is Justin Upton. He signed a large six year contract worth $132.75 million last offseason that will pay him $22.5 million each of the next five seasons, which are his age 29 through 33 seasons. His first season as a Tiger was largely deemed as a failure, as he slashed .246/.310/.465/.775 with a 105 wRC+.

Those numbers are well below his career line of .268/.347/.472/.819 with a +119 wRC+, and it looks like that contract is going to be a behemoth of an anchor if he can’t produce at a level near or above his career norms.

However, his 2016 slash was dragged down by a downright putrid April and May in which he hit .217/.264/.326/.590 with a 54 wRC+, 36.5 K% and a measly 3 HR. Upton is known to be a very streaky player, but this was awful, even by his standard of streakiness. From June 1st through the end of the season, he turned his season around with a .259/.331/.531/.862 with a 128 wRC+, 28 HR, and BB and K rates of 8.9% and 24.9%, much closer to his career norms.

A trade for Upton would be investing in the player from June 1 through the end of the year as opposed to the player from the first two months of the season. If he can avoid such a slump like he had in April/May, which is likely considering the severity of it and how he bounced back, then it’s likely that he can revert to being a 3-4 win player as opposed to his 1.4 fWAR in 2016.

He’s a proven power hitter, and that was shown that he still has the ability to hit 25 plus home runs. He’s not a fantastic defender in LF by any means, but his DRS of 1 in 2016 and 8 in 2015 show that he’s a capable outfielder, and his baserunning has received a positive rating in each of his nine seasons.

He’s an athletic, powerful hitter who runs the bases well and is a proven power hitter and run producer. You’ll have to deal with his streaks of dismal hitting, but his hot streaks often outweigh them.

If the Blue Jays can get the Tigers to eat a portion of the money in the remaining years of the deal in order to make the yearly salary a little more palatable, let’s say $2.5 million a year, you’d have to imagine they wouldn’t have to give a huge package of prospects when taking on that kind of money.

By taking on that kind of money, the Jays could demand a reliever in the deal as well. Justin Wilson is a name that has been named in rumours, Shane Greene showed lots of promise in a bullpen role last year, and Bruce Rondon is another name that would intrigue the Jays.

Upton’s contract is obviously very heavy, and owing $20+ million to Troy Tulowitzki, Russell Martin, Upton, and potentially Josh Donaldson a couple years down the road could be a roadblock for future moves, but the Blue Jays management already showed the willingness to spend $20 million on another player by offering Encarnacion 4/80 earlier this offseason.

A trade like this would fill a hole in the Jays OF, while also opening up the possibility of filling a need in the bullpen as well, without having to give up a package of prospects that would deplete the upper minors.

The one caveat of this idea that exists is Upton’s no trade clause, that allows him to block trades to 20 different teams. It’s unknown whether or not the Blue Jays are on that list or not, or if he would block a trade or not to Toronto if they are indeed on the list, but an opportunity to play with his brother on a competitive team, in a hitters ballpark could be enough to incite him to allow such a move.

The Royals are another team that seem to be caught in between trying to compete with their existing core for another year, or selling off assets that they won’t be able to re-sign in order to facilitate a quick rebuild.

They’re still a talented team, with many players still employed that were on their team when they won the World Series in 2015; however, they failed to play at a level in 2016 that would have gotten them into the playoffs, and they’ve already lost Morales in free agency and Wade Davis via trade.

This has spurned talks of a sell, and there was rumours of this beginning at last year’s trade deadline. They held off on doing so at the time, but the Davis trade could be one of many deals they make if they end up committing to this process.

The potential free agents they’ll have after the 2017 season are Eric Hosmer, Mike Moustakas, Lorenzo Cain, Jarrod Dyson, Alcides Escobar, and Danny Duffy. That’s a very good group of players, and the Royals have virtually no chance of resigning them all. With their chances of making the playoffs already lower after their 2016 season that resulted in nothing, and the compensation for departing free agents is worse than it was before the new CBA, there is plenty of value for the Royals to trade off assets.

The idea below is contingent on whether or not the Royals continue to make trades like the Davis for Jorge Soler trade, if they don’t and decide to take one more run with the current core, than this idea likely isn’t at all realistic. With that being said, I think the Jays could target Ian Kennedy and his ugly contract.

There were rumours circulating about the Royals looking to offload Kennedy’s contract in the summer and nothing came to fruition at the time, but I believe this is a good time for the Blue Jays to use this to their advantage.

Kennedy signed with the Royals last offseason for five years and 70 million. He is owed $13 million in 2017, followed by 16, 16.5, and 16.5 in the three years following. It’s not a flattering contract by any means, but Kennedy isn’t useless, coming off a season where he threw 195.2 IP with a 3.68 ERA and a 4.67 FIP, which is dragged down because of an ugly 1.52 HR/9.

If the Royals are indeed sold on selling, keeping Kennedy’s contract on the books for the next four years doesn’t make a whole lot of sense. By the time they’re ready to compete again, he won’t be a major contributor, and they’d be better off saving that money, or better yet, spending it to resign one of their young soon-to-be free agents in the short term.

By taking on Kennedy’s full salary, you open up the potential to get Dyson or Cain included in the deal at a relative bargain. Obviously, you’ll have to create a package that entices the Royals, despite the money involved, but the Blue Jays can create leverage for themselves in that regard by taking on the salary commitments.

Getting Cain would be a big boost for this team in 2017, and even Dyson would provide a lot of value if he were to be acquired as well, so I believe it’s well worth the salary investment in order to acquire one or both of them. As far as Kennedy goes, well, you can plug him into the fifth starter role, while Liriano moves into the bullpen as the primary lefty. It gives you depth in both the bullpen and rotation.

The contracts of Liriano and Marco Estrada are off the books at the end of the season, making the absorption of Kennedy’s contract a little bit easier, and he can fill a back of the rotation role following 2017. It’s obviously a pricey cost to fill such a role, but if it means you can acquire help for the major league team in 2017 without giving up top prospects, it’s a worthwhile proposition. Doing so would bridge the competitive gap until the next wave of prospects enter the big leagues.

Kennedy’s 2016 1.52 HR rate is obviously a concern, but that concern comes with a 8.46 K/9 and a 3.04 BB/9, so there’s clearly something to work with here. By no means are you acquiring dead weight. The home run concern was beat to death when Estrada was acquired, but it was simply pitch usage and repertoire adjustments that have unlocked the success he’s had the past two years. There’s no way to say if the same is possible with Kennedy, but at least the consistent track record with regards to his strikeout and walk totals is a good sign.