<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reviewing Baseball America&#8217;s Top 30 Jays Prospects: 2007 Edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jaysjournal.com/2011/01/03/reviewing-baseball-americas-top-30-jays-prospects-2007-edition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jaysjournal.com/2011/01/03/reviewing-baseball-americas-top-30-jays-prospects-2007-edition/</link>
	<description>A Toronto Blue Jays Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 19:16:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mat Germain</title>
		<link>http://jaysjournal.com/2011/01/03/reviewing-baseball-americas-top-30-jays-prospects-2007-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-2497</link>
		<dc:creator>Mat Germain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 22:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaysjournal.com/?p=3814#comment-2497</guid>
		<description>Thanks for putting so much thought and energy into your responses everyone. I&#039;ll get to TammyBeth&#039;s comment in a minute, but since they&#039;re easier to address, I wanted to respond to Steve and Keith first.

@Steve: the Jays are definitely not in rebuild mode. They are ready to compete at a high level today and I would say they are building for a championship run within the next few years. I agree that the thought process changed while JP was still around, but that&#039;s because everything he had done before that was never enough to bring the Jays to that next level. His strategy just didn&#039;t work in terms of getting a big enough group of top-talent together to make a run. As for the Godfrey and Beaston influences, I can&#039;t say for sure and wouldn&#039;t want to guess. But, I will say that I believe JP lost the confidence of the front office at the very same time as the Jays strategy changed. And 3 years later, without a top 10 pick I might add, the Jays have the 4th best system in the majors. I agree with you that the system should now start producing those missing top players that could have made the Jays 90+ game winners while JP was around.

@Keith: I posted a comparison of the Rays and Jays picks over the last few years and it gives you a very good reason as to why JP&#039;s strategy couldn&#039;t work. Here&#039;s the link:

http://jaysjournal.com/2010/01/21/will-jays-ever-draft-in-top-4-again/

He wouldn&#039;t go over slot for better talent and couldn&#039;t outspend the Yankees or Red Sox. Meanwhile, the Rays were loaded to the brim with top 5 picks from their many years of losing. That&#039;s why the Jays need a guy like AA. He can alter his strategy to fit the Jays situation. Would JP have obtained Miguel Olivo to get himself a sandwich pick? Never. I agree with most of everything you said Steve and am glad you&#039;re enjoying the content! We&#039;ll do our very best to keep it up!

@TammyBeth: You&#039;ve convinced me to do a JP Ricciardi post. It&#039;s going to be a long one, so give it a few weeks before it pops up, but it will be very thorough. I&#039;ll try to point out his lack of motivation in terms of trading and searching the world for top-talent, but will also point out his positives (which many people overlook) such as those you point out in your response - the additions of great picks and producing more MLB players than most other franchises. My point for this post was never to discredit that, it was simply to point out the difference between the cream of the crop in his prospects and those behind them. His strategy led to so few late round finds that the Jays could never supplement their roster by calling up some players to help out, finding the odd gem, or by trading some of those prospects for guys that would have helped them get into the playoffs. It&#039;s not just about the guys you keep. If AA is smart, and I know he is, he&#039;ll be ready and willing to package up some prospects for a top notch player when the time is right. That&#039;s why quantity and quality are important to a franchise like the Jays, not just quality. If they don&#039;t have both, they would be forced to wait to &quot;get lucky&quot; and the stars to align just to get into the playoffs. Instead, AA is trying to accumulate enough long term stars in each position so that he can trade some of his newly drafted and well thought of guys in return for the required pieces to become a powerhouse.

Breath - haha

What it all comes down to is that JP worked hard to get a winning Jays MLB club, while AA is working hard to build a strong DSL Blue Jays - GCL Blue Jays - Vancouver Canadians - Lansing Lugnuts - Dunedin Blue Jays - New Hampshire Fishercats - Las Vegas 51s - AND Jays MLB club.

I&#039;ll take the 2nd version every single time if offered the choice.

I wish I could have read your initial post Tammy and thank you for the great response. I&#039;m hoping that our coverage of the top 50 Jays prospects will cheer you up and give you hope for what should become the best group of Jays prospects to ever be accumulated by a Jays GM. No matter how we spin it, that can&#039;t be a bad thing, can it?





@</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for putting so much thought and energy into your responses everyone. I&#8217;ll get to TammyBeth&#8217;s comment in a minute, but since they&#8217;re easier to address, I wanted to respond to Steve and Keith first.</p>
<p>@Steve: the Jays are definitely not in rebuild mode. They are ready to compete at a high level today and I would say they are building for a championship run within the next few years. I agree that the thought process changed while JP was still around, but that&#8217;s because everything he had done before that was never enough to bring the Jays to that next level. His strategy just didn&#8217;t work in terms of getting a big enough group of top-talent together to make a run. As for the Godfrey and Beaston influences, I can&#8217;t say for sure and wouldn&#8217;t want to guess. But, I will say that I believe JP lost the confidence of the front office at the very same time as the Jays strategy changed. And 3 years later, without a top 10 pick I might add, the Jays have the 4th best system in the majors. I agree with you that the system should now start producing those missing top players that could have made the Jays 90+ game winners while JP was around.</p>
<p>@Keith: I posted a comparison of the Rays and Jays picks over the last few years and it gives you a very good reason as to why JP&#8217;s strategy couldn&#8217;t work. Here&#8217;s the link:</p>
<p><a href="http://jaysjournal.com/2010/01/21/will-jays-ever-draft-in-top-4-again/" rel="nofollow">http://jaysjournal.com/2010/01/21/will-jays-ever-draft-in-top-4-again/</a></p>
<p>He wouldn&#8217;t go over slot for better talent and couldn&#8217;t outspend the Yankees or Red Sox. Meanwhile, the Rays were loaded to the brim with top 5 picks from their many years of losing. That&#8217;s why the Jays need a guy like AA. He can alter his strategy to fit the Jays situation. Would JP have obtained Miguel Olivo to get himself a sandwich pick? Never. I agree with most of everything you said Steve and am glad you&#8217;re enjoying the content! We&#8217;ll do our very best to keep it up!</p>
<p>@TammyBeth: You&#8217;ve convinced me to do a JP Ricciardi post. It&#8217;s going to be a long one, so give it a few weeks before it pops up, but it will be very thorough. I&#8217;ll try to point out his lack of motivation in terms of trading and searching the world for top-talent, but will also point out his positives (which many people overlook) such as those you point out in your response &#8211; the additions of great picks and producing more MLB players than most other franchises. My point for this post was never to discredit that, it was simply to point out the difference between the cream of the crop in his prospects and those behind them. His strategy led to so few late round finds that the Jays could never supplement their roster by calling up some players to help out, finding the odd gem, or by trading some of those prospects for guys that would have helped them get into the playoffs. It&#8217;s not just about the guys you keep. If AA is smart, and I know he is, he&#8217;ll be ready and willing to package up some prospects for a top notch player when the time is right. That&#8217;s why quantity and quality are important to a franchise like the Jays, not just quality. If they don&#8217;t have both, they would be forced to wait to &#8220;get lucky&#8221; and the stars to align just to get into the playoffs. Instead, AA is trying to accumulate enough long term stars in each position so that he can trade some of his newly drafted and well thought of guys in return for the required pieces to become a powerhouse.</p>
<p>Breath &#8211; haha</p>
<p>What it all comes down to is that JP worked hard to get a winning Jays MLB club, while AA is working hard to build a strong DSL Blue Jays &#8211; GCL Blue Jays &#8211; Vancouver Canadians &#8211; Lansing Lugnuts &#8211; Dunedin Blue Jays &#8211; New Hampshire Fishercats &#8211; Las Vegas 51s &#8211; AND Jays MLB club.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll take the 2nd version every single time if offered the choice.</p>
<p>I wish I could have read your initial post Tammy and thank you for the great response. I&#8217;m hoping that our coverage of the top 50 Jays prospects will cheer you up and give you hope for what should become the best group of Jays prospects to ever be accumulated by a Jays GM. No matter how we spin it, that can&#8217;t be a bad thing, can it?</p>
<p>@</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://jaysjournal.com/2011/01/03/reviewing-baseball-americas-top-30-jays-prospects-2007-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-2495</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 21:25:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaysjournal.com/?p=3814#comment-2495</guid>
		<description>First GREAT article. This is why I check this site out every day!
While agree that AA has benefited from being in the right place at the right time, we should not make the mistake of saying JP was as good as AA has been so far. This isn&#039;t just because AA is Canadian. He has consistently looked to upgrade this team for a long run of winning. Case in point Marcum for Lawrie.
JP treated Toronto like a small market and primarily drafted college players who would be able to supplement his Free agents quickly. See Russ Adams. I believe this was done as he wanted to win quickly and didn&#039;t truly assess the opportunities of the team he inherited. 
If you believe drafting &quot;high ceiling players&quot; is riskier and takes more time. As they need time to harness their talent. JP didn&#039;t want to wait. He thought he was the smartest person in every room and he could go out and put together a winning team with an assembly of big name Free agents. Also supporting this is that the Gose or Morrow trades would never have happened under JP&#039;s watch. 
Furthermore AA was smart enough to understand the brand equity the Jays have in Central America and especially the Caribbean. So let&#039;s not defend JP too quickly he really did run this organization into the ground through his choices of Manager and players: cutting Carpenter was his first task as GM, Burnett&#039;s contract &amp; BJ Ryan.

That said, it would be good to make a note and see if our belief in AA is justified. i.e. After the 2013 off season we should go back and see where our 2010 BA top 30 are.
I know there will be some huge misses, but if AA&#039;s philosophy of going after high ceiling guys is right we should see a distinct change in several fronts: 
1 - % on the 40 man roster
2 - MLB regulars

2 things that worry me:
It is evident that we have at least 2 more years (2011 &amp; 2012) before we will see the light at the end of this tunnel. Taking Drabek, Arencibia and even Stewart out as they will likely be regulars in 2010. The best players in our system are at least 1 maybe 2 or more years away: Hechavaria, D&#039;Arnaud, Perez, Gose. I believe the pitching is there, but we don&#039;t have enough of a well balanced attack to compete.... yet. We desperately need some guys with bat skills and a nack for OBP.
Johermyn Chavez could be an impact player.....But I suppose if Morrow becomes a legitimate #1 it was well worth it.

Does anyone know how these stats compare to Tampa&#039;s/ Minnesota&#039;s 2007 draft?
Once again (as usual) well worth the read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First GREAT article. This is why I check this site out every day!<br />
While agree that AA has benefited from being in the right place at the right time, we should not make the mistake of saying JP was as good as AA has been so far. This isn&#8217;t just because AA is Canadian. He has consistently looked to upgrade this team for a long run of winning. Case in point Marcum for Lawrie.<br />
JP treated Toronto like a small market and primarily drafted college players who would be able to supplement his Free agents quickly. See Russ Adams. I believe this was done as he wanted to win quickly and didn&#8217;t truly assess the opportunities of the team he inherited.<br />
If you believe drafting &#8220;high ceiling players&#8221; is riskier and takes more time. As they need time to harness their talent. JP didn&#8217;t want to wait. He thought he was the smartest person in every room and he could go out and put together a winning team with an assembly of big name Free agents. Also supporting this is that the Gose or Morrow trades would never have happened under JP&#8217;s watch.<br />
Furthermore AA was smart enough to understand the brand equity the Jays have in Central America and especially the Caribbean. So let&#8217;s not defend JP too quickly he really did run this organization into the ground through his choices of Manager and players: cutting Carpenter was his first task as GM, Burnett&#8217;s contract &amp; BJ Ryan.</p>
<p>That said, it would be good to make a note and see if our belief in AA is justified. i.e. After the 2013 off season we should go back and see where our 2010 BA top 30 are.<br />
I know there will be some huge misses, but if AA&#8217;s philosophy of going after high ceiling guys is right we should see a distinct change in several fronts:<br />
1 &#8211; % on the 40 man roster<br />
2 &#8211; MLB regulars</p>
<p>2 things that worry me:<br />
It is evident that we have at least 2 more years (2011 &amp; 2012) before we will see the light at the end of this tunnel. Taking Drabek, Arencibia and even Stewart out as they will likely be regulars in 2010. The best players in our system are at least 1 maybe 2 or more years away: Hechavaria, D&#8217;Arnaud, Perez, Gose. I believe the pitching is there, but we don&#8217;t have enough of a well balanced attack to compete&#8230;. yet. We desperately need some guys with bat skills and a nack for OBP.<br />
Johermyn Chavez could be an impact player&#8230;..But I suppose if Morrow becomes a legitimate #1 it was well worth it.</p>
<p>Does anyone know how these stats compare to Tampa&#8217;s/ Minnesota&#8217;s 2007 draft?<br />
Once again (as usual) well worth the read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://jaysjournal.com/2011/01/03/reviewing-baseball-americas-top-30-jays-prospects-2007-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-2491</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 17:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaysjournal.com/?p=3814#comment-2491</guid>
		<description>Thanks Tammy Beth for the WAR info. Sounds like a lot more work than I would care to do, but a very useful measure of the success of the drafts. I often feel that JP Ricciardi has been unduly criticized. His drafts were obviously far more successful than what people give him credit for. The current lofty status of the Jays farm system could end up producing no more than what the Jays produced under Ricciardi. And if that were to happen, the Jays would continue producing winning teams. But more importantly, it seems everyone is prepared to credit AA&#039;s genius for the state of the farm system and while it has played a part, there are other contributing factors. Three significant things occurred during the offseason leading up to JP Ricciardi&#039;s final season, which have changed how things are done under AA. First, Paul Beeston took over for Paul Godfrey, second the Jays lost AJ Burnett and failed to sign Halladay to an extension and finally the Jays no longer received transfers from MLB to compensate for the low CDN dollar. The results: Beeston is a baseball person, Godfrey was a fan. Godfrey got money from Rogers with strings attached. Beeston gets commitments from Rogers. Godfrey likely interfered in the Wells extension and the Frank Thomas signing. Those moves wreak of his finger prints. Next, the Jays failure to sign Burnett and Halladay meant that a switch in operational mode from contenders to rebuild was inevitable. Finally, the end of MLB transfers also meant the end of the Jays commitment to not go over slot in the draft. Today, AA has a farm system rich in talent with higher priced interantional signings (there are a number of international signings from the Ricciardi years in the sytem, they just weren&#039;t big money signings), overslot draft picks, and (thanks to being in rebuild mode) compensation for letting free agents walk and prospects acquired in trades. The process for all of this began under Ricciardi. I think the time was right to fire Ricciardi and I do like AA a lot as his replacement. I just think the difference between the two isn&#039;t as great as some people would like to believe. BTW, this is a great site. I wish it great success.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Tammy Beth for the WAR info. Sounds like a lot more work than I would care to do, but a very useful measure of the success of the drafts. I often feel that JP Ricciardi has been unduly criticized. His drafts were obviously far more successful than what people give him credit for. The current lofty status of the Jays farm system could end up producing no more than what the Jays produced under Ricciardi. And if that were to happen, the Jays would continue producing winning teams. But more importantly, it seems everyone is prepared to credit AA&#8217;s genius for the state of the farm system and while it has played a part, there are other contributing factors. Three significant things occurred during the offseason leading up to JP Ricciardi&#8217;s final season, which have changed how things are done under AA. First, Paul Beeston took over for Paul Godfrey, second the Jays lost AJ Burnett and failed to sign Halladay to an extension and finally the Jays no longer received transfers from MLB to compensate for the low CDN dollar. The results: Beeston is a baseball person, Godfrey was a fan. Godfrey got money from Rogers with strings attached. Beeston gets commitments from Rogers. Godfrey likely interfered in the Wells extension and the Frank Thomas signing. Those moves wreak of his finger prints. Next, the Jays failure to sign Burnett and Halladay meant that a switch in operational mode from contenders to rebuild was inevitable. Finally, the end of MLB transfers also meant the end of the Jays commitment to not go over slot in the draft. Today, AA has a farm system rich in talent with higher priced interantional signings (there are a number of international signings from the Ricciardi years in the sytem, they just weren&#8217;t big money signings), overslot draft picks, and (thanks to being in rebuild mode) compensation for letting free agents walk and prospects acquired in trades. The process for all of this began under Ricciardi. I think the time was right to fire Ricciardi and I do like AA a lot as his replacement. I just think the difference between the two isn&#8217;t as great as some people would like to believe. BTW, this is a great site. I wish it great success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TammyBeth</title>
		<link>http://jaysjournal.com/2011/01/03/reviewing-baseball-americas-top-30-jays-prospects-2007-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-2488</link>
		<dc:creator>TammyBeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 09:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaysjournal.com/?p=3814#comment-2488</guid>
		<description>ok, that worked - so here&#039;s the condensed point:

JP was flawed, Alex is WAAAAY better - BUT - 

Looking over the available systems in that viewer, including well regarded systems, you can state with confidence that at least 2/3 of ALL those lists are going to fail to be significant major leaguers. Every list I looked at had between 5 and 9 players who were either contributing major leaguers or still considered good prospects. But often on the higher numbers, the major leaguers were fringy guys for the most part (see the Phillies list, for instance)

The difference in a highly regarded system (like the Rockies) and a lowly regarded one (like the Jays) is usually pretty danged marginal.1,2 guys in general.

Last winter, or the year before, I totaled the WAR for all the major leaguers drafted since 2002 and the Jays came out 3rd in the majors. (Surprisingly, the Giants were #1). That might not still be true, but JP gets more criticism than he should on this front, IMO. (although some things, like neglecting the overseas players, are obviously very valid)

My take away from this, though, is as excited as we are now about the Jays farm, 2/3 of the top 30 will likely fail if history is any indication. I find that depressing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok, that worked &#8211; so here&#8217;s the condensed point:</p>
<p>JP was flawed, Alex is WAAAAY better &#8211; BUT &#8211; </p>
<p>Looking over the available systems in that viewer, including well regarded systems, you can state with confidence that at least 2/3 of ALL those lists are going to fail to be significant major leaguers. Every list I looked at had between 5 and 9 players who were either contributing major leaguers or still considered good prospects. But often on the higher numbers, the major leaguers were fringy guys for the most part (see the Phillies list, for instance)</p>
<p>The difference in a highly regarded system (like the Rockies) and a lowly regarded one (like the Jays) is usually pretty danged marginal.1,2 guys in general.</p>
<p>Last winter, or the year before, I totaled the WAR for all the major leaguers drafted since 2002 and the Jays came out 3rd in the majors. (Surprisingly, the Giants were #1). That might not still be true, but JP gets more criticism than he should on this front, IMO. (although some things, like neglecting the overseas players, are obviously very valid)</p>
<p>My take away from this, though, is as excited as we are now about the Jays farm, 2/3 of the top 30 will likely fail if history is any indication. I find that depressing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TammyBeth</title>
		<link>http://jaysjournal.com/2011/01/03/reviewing-baseball-americas-top-30-jays-prospects-2007-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-2487</link>
		<dc:creator>TammyBeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 09:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaysjournal.com/?p=3814#comment-2487</guid>
		<description>I just spent most of an hour looking at the book and writing out a thoughtful reply to this (excellent) post, and this sorry @%&amp;% Capcha failed and dumped the whole f&#039;n thing.

I ain&#039;t doin&#039; that again.

Sigh. When will I ever learn to copy before i post just in case?

I will repeat this though - Magee has been out of our system since 2009.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just spent most of an hour looking at the book and writing out a thoughtful reply to this (excellent) post, and this sorry @%&amp;% Capcha failed and dumped the whole f&#8217;n thing.</p>
<p>I ain&#8217;t doin&#8217; that again.</p>
<p>Sigh. When will I ever learn to copy before i post just in case?</p>
<p>I will repeat this though &#8211; Magee has been out of our system since 2009.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Database Caching 6/15 queries in 0.028 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 359/363 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.fansided.com

 Served from: jaysjournal.com @ 2013-06-19 10:19:17 by W3 Total Cache -->